The underlying act is supported, but the wording goes further: The Supreme Court expressed anger at the police for arranging media interviews with Afzal Guru.

Afzal Guru was convicted for his role in the 2001 Indian Parliament attack... In this interview by Shams Tahir Khan, Afzal Guru confessed his involvement. (interview conducted 2001, shortly after arrest). - youtube.com (2001) After his arrest, Guru made a confessional statement which bore his signature... The Supreme Court was angered by the act of police officials, who, in their over-zealousness, had arranged for a media interview. - en.wikipedia.org (2005-08-10) Many Indian activists and lawyers have claimed that Afzal Guru did not receive proper legal representation. He did not have a lawyer from the time of his arrest until he confessed in police custody. Afzal Guru claimed that he had been tortured into making his confession, which he later retracted. Several Indian activists and senior lawyers have said that he did not have effective assistance of counsel. - Human Rights Watch (2013-02-09) This is the second hanging and it is really a distressing step back, Human Rights Watch believes that the death penalty should be abolished because it is an inhumane and irreversible process, said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director for Human Rights Watch. Human Rights groups had alleged the 43-year-old Guru was not given immediate legal representation and thus denied a fair trial. - Voice of America (2013-02-09) In the Parliament attack case I was entrapped by the Special Task Force of Kashmir... STF made an [a] scapegoat in all this criminal act... Afzal Guru was admittedly a surrendered militant. - Frontline (2013-04-24)

From reporting

• The 2004 letter allegations against Davinder Singh were made years after the attack and trial. They were not tested as evidence in the Parliament attack case.
• Davinder Singh's 2020 arrest was for allegedly helping terrorists in a separate incident 19 years after the 2001 attack. It does not retroactively prove he was a mole at the time of Guru's arrest or that the 2001 trial was compromised.
• The media confession was ruled inadmissible by courts but other evidence was used for conviction.
• Amnesty International and HRW opposed the death penalty in principle and criticised procedural aspects, but did not overturn the judicial findings of guilt.

• Account posts political content focused on human rights, Kashmir issues, and criticism of Indian state actions and ruling party IT cell.
• This reel is part of advocacy linking Afzal Guru's case to current cases involving Umar Khalid.

• Analysis rests on on-screen text, caption, and keyframe vision model output; no full audio speech transcript was available.
• Dropped 1 support citation(s) for "Afzal Guru admitted his guilt in a media interview shortl…" because the cited passages do not address the claim directly.
• Dropped 1 support citation(s) for "Afzal Guru claimed that he spoke to the media under extre…" because the cited passages do not address the claim directly.
• Dropped 1 support citation(s) for "Afzal Guru was never given a fair trial." because the cited passages do not address the claim directly.
• Dropped 1 support citation(s) for "Human Rights Watch condemned the judgment in the Afzal Gu…" because the cited passages do not address the claim directly.